EKLI - Life, together

Ways Christians See It

Who decides, in a church?

Acts 6:1-6, Acts 15:1-29, 1 Timothy 3:1-13, 1 Peter 5:1-4

The New Testament names offices, gives qualifications for them, and shows decisions being made. What it does not do is provide an organisational chart. Elders appear in the plural. Overseer and elder seem to name the same role. Deacons serve. An apostle appoints. A council in Jerusalem settles a dispute for churches elsewhere, and a whole assembly is present when it does.

Every structure below is an attempt to arrange the same evidence, and the arrangements produce very different churches. This looks like the driest question in this hall until a congregation is in crisis, at which point it becomes the only one anybody is asking.

Where everyone agrees

Everyone agrees Christ is the head of the church, that leaders are servants rather than rulers, that the New Testament names real offices with real qualifications, and that authority in the church is for building up rather than domination. The disagreement is about where the deciding authority sits.

Bishops, in succession

Authority runs through bishops who stand in continuity with the apostles, and who ordain, teach, and guard the unity of the church.

What it claims

This is the structure the church actually had as soon as we can see it. Ignatius of Antioch, writing around AD 110 within living memory of the apostles, assumes a bishop in every church and treats it as unremarkable. The New Testament shows the pattern forming: apostles appoint, Timothy and Titus are left with authority to appoint elders and correct churches, and the Jerusalem council decides for congregations that were not present. Someone has to be able to say what the church teaches, or every congregation becomes its own denomination within a generation. Succession is not magic. It is accountability with a memory.

Who holds it

, , Anglican, and most Methodist and Lutheran churches. Between them, the large majority of Christians in the world.

The texts it stands on

  • Titus 1:5 Left in Crete to appoint elders in every town, which is authority over multiple congregations
  • Acts 15:22-29 A council binding churches that were not in the room
  • 1 Timothy 5:19-22 Timothy receives charges against elders and lays on hands, which is oversight
  • 2 Timothy 2:2 Entrust to faithful men who will be able to teach others, a chain of transmission

Strongest case

It has by far the best historical claim, since it is demonstrably what the church looked like within a generation of the apostles and remained for fifteen centuries. It also solves the problem of doctrinal drift better than the alternatives, and its critics tend to concede this while objecting on other grounds.

Hardest question

Concentrated authority has been catastrophically abused, and the abuse scandals of recent decades are structural as much as personal, since the same office investigated itself. The New Testament also uses elder and overseer interchangeably, which suggests a plurality of elders rather than one bishop over them, and the monarchical bishop looks like a development rather than an institution.

How it answers that

The abuse charge is granted without qualification and has been addressed by these churches with public admissions of failure. The structural response is that oversight failed, not that oversight is wrong, and a church with an abusive pastor has fewer remedies rather than more, since there is nobody above him. On the vocabulary, the position agrees the terms overlap in the New Testament and says the office differentiated as the apostles died, which is exactly what you would expect and exactly what Ignatius describes so early that a long development is not available.

Holding the map

Every polity here can name a catastrophe the others avoided, and each has presided over one of its own. Nobody has found the structure that survives bad people, which is worth remembering before treating this as the question that fixes a church.

In practice the gap between stated polity and actual practice is enormous. Plenty of congregational churches are functionally run by one man, and plenty of parishes are functionally run by a committee of long-standing members. It is worth asking who decides in your church rather than what the constitution says.

EKLI serves Christians across traditions. On questions where churches differ we explain how each one sees it and leave the deciding to you.

All 27 questions →